ISSN 2077-3528

IJTPE Journal

 

International Journal on

Technical and Physical Problems of Engineering

(IJTPE)

 

International Organization of IOTPE

 

 

Home     IOTPE Organization     ICTPE Conference     IJTPE Journal     IETPE Enterprise
 

Contributors

Aim and Scope

Journal Fees

Publication Policy

Checklist Policy

IJTPE Journal Issues

Editorial Board

Journal Topics

Journal Citations

Publication Ethics

Copyright & Licensing

 

Advisory Board

Submission of Papers

Call for Papers

Peer Review

Contacts 

 

Scientific Board

Format of Papers

 

Plagiarism - COI

 

 

 

 

PUBLICATION ETHICS AND MALPRACTICE STATEMENT

 

The International Journal on Technical and Physical Problems of Engineering (IJTPE) is dedicated to upholding the highest standards of integrity, transparency, and ethical conduct in scientific publishing. The journal follows the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) Core Practices and expects all authors, editors, reviewers, and contributors to adhere to these principles.

 

1. Authorship and Contribution

- Authorship should reflect meaningful contributions to the research. All listed authors must have participated significantly in the work and approved the final version of the manuscript.

- The corresponding author is responsible for ensuring that all co-authors are properly included and that no inappropriate authorship is assigned.

 

2. Ethical Responsibilities of Authors

- Authors must ensure their submitted manuscripts are original works, free from plagiarism, and have not been published elsewhere or simultaneously submitted to other journals.

- Authors should accurately report their research methods, data, results, and provide sufficient detail to allow replication by others.

- All sources and relevant prior work must be properly cited.

- Authors must disclose any financial or non-financial conflicts of interest that could influence their work.

- Authorship must be limited to individuals who have significantly contributed to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the research. All listed authors must approve the final version of the manuscript.

 

3. Ethical Responsibilities of Editors

- Editors will evaluate manuscripts based on academic merit, originality, clarity, and relevance to the journal’s scope, without discrimination based on authors’ race, gender, institutional affiliation, or personal characteristics.

- Editors must maintain confidentiality of submitted manuscripts and avoid disclosing any information to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, and editorial board members.

- Editors will actively investigate suspected misconduct, including plagiarism, data fabrication, or unethical research practices, and will take appropriate corrective action, such as issuing corrections or retractions.

 

4. Ethical Responsibilities of Reviewers

- Reviewers must evaluate manuscripts objectively, fairly, and in a timely manner.

- Reviewers should identify potential ethical concerns such as plagiarism, duplicate publication, or data manipulation and report them to the editors.

- Reviewers must maintain confidentiality and avoid sharing or using unpublished material for personal advantage.

- Reviewers should disclose any conflicts of interest that could affect their impartiality.

 

5. Research Involving Human Participants

- Authors reporting research involving human participants must confirm that their studies were conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and relevant national or institutional ethical standards.

- Authors must include a statement affirming that informed consent was obtained from all participants or their legal guardians.

- Manuscripts must clearly state any relevant ethical approval information, including the name of the ethics committee or institutional review board (IRB) and approval number if applicable.

- Authors should ensure that personal data and privacy of participants are protected, and that confidentiality is maintained in accordance with applicable data protection laws.

 

6. Plagiarism and Misconduct

- IJTPE strictly prohibits all forms of plagiarism, self-plagiarism, and fabrication or falsification of data.

- Submitted manuscripts are checked for similarity using reliable plagiarism detection software before acceptance.

- Proven cases of misconduct may result in manuscript rejection, publication of corrections or retractions, and notification to the authors’ institutions.

 

7. Corrections and Retractions

- The IJTPE Journal is committed to maintaining the accuracy and integrity of the scientific record.

- Errors discovered post-publication that affect the interpretation or reliability of the research will be corrected through an erratum or corrigendum.

- Articles may be retracted in cases of research misconduct, ethical violations, or major errors.

 

8. Complaints and Appeals

- The IJTPE Journal is committed to handling all concerns in a fair, respectful, and transparent manner. Authors, reviewers, and readers may submit complaints or appeals regarding editorial decisions, ethical concerns, or publication processes.

- All complaints will be reviewed carefully by the editorial team. Where necessary, additional information may be requested to ensure a balanced and objective evaluation. Appeals against editorial decisions will be considered based on clear scientific and ethical justification.

- The IJTPE Journal aims to respond to all concerns in a timely manner and in accordance with its ethical standards.

 

9. Conflict of Interest

- All participants in the publication process including authors, reviewers, and editors are expected to disclose any financial, personal, or professional relationships that could influence their work.

- Authors should clearly state any potential conflicts of interest in their manuscript. Reviewers and editors must also declare any conflicts and withdraw from the evaluation process when appropriate.

- The IJTPE Journal ensures that all decisions are made objectively and free from bias.

 

10. Data Availability and Reproducibility

- The IJTPE Journal encourages transparency and reproducibility in research. Authors are encouraged to provide sufficient data, methods, and details to allow other researchers to verify and reproduce the results.

- Where appropriate, authors may share datasets through recognized repositories or include data availability statements within their manuscripts.

 

11. Ethical Oversight

- Research involving human participants or animals must comply with recognized ethical standards and regulations.

- Authors must confirm that appropriate ethical approval has been obtained from relevant institutional or regulatory bodies, and that informed consent has been secured where required.

- The IJTPE Journal reserves the right to request supporting documentation if necessary.

 

12. Handling Allegations of Misconduct

- IJTPE will investigate all allegations of misconduct in accordance with COPE guidelines.

- Investigations will be fair, unbiased, and confidential, involving consultation with relevant parties.

- If misconduct is confirmed, appropriate actions, such as rejection, retraction, or notification of institutions, will be taken.

 

13. Post-Publication Discussion and Corrections

- The IJTPE Journal welcomes constructive feedback and scholarly discussion regarding published articles. Readers may contact the journal to raise questions, comments, or concerns about published work.

- When necessary, the journal will take appropriate action, including issuing corrections, clarifications, or retractions, in accordance with ethical publishing standards.

 

14. Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) in Research and Publication

- The IJTPE Journal recognizes the growing role of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) tools in research and scholarly communication. When used responsibly, these tools can support aspects of the research and writing process.

- Authors may use GenAI tools for purposes such as language editing, formatting, or limited analytical assistance. Any such use must be transparently and clearly disclosed within the manuscript. GenAI tools cannot be credited as authors or co-authors under any circumstances.

- Authors retain full responsibility for the content of their work, including its accuracy, originality, and scientific integrity. The use of GenAI must not lead to plagiarism, fabrication of data, or any form of misleading or unethical representation of results.

- Editors and reviewers are expected to use GenAI tools, if at all, with caution and only in ways that fully preserve the confidentiality of submitted manuscripts and uphold the integrity of the peer-review process.

 

15. Process for Identification and Handling of Research Misconduct

- The IJTPE Journal is committed to upholding the highest standards of publication ethics and treats all concerns related to research misconduct with seriousness and care.

- All submitted manuscripts are carefully reviewed for originality and ethical integrity. If any concerns arise, such as plagiarism, data fabrication, citation manipulation, or other forms of unethical research practice, the IJTPE Journal will promptly begin a fair and confidential assessment.

- The evaluation process typically involves an initial review by the editorial team, followed by communication with the corresponding author to seek clarification where needed. Relevant evidence and supporting materials are examined carefully, and, when appropriate, independent experts or reviewers may be consulted to ensure an objective assessment.

- If misconduct is confirmed, the journal will take appropriate and proportionate action. Depending on the situation, this may include rejection of the manuscript, publication of corrections, retraction of the article if it has already been published, and, where necessary, informing the authors’ affiliated institutions.

- The IJTPE Journal follows internationally recognized ethical standards and adheres to the principles and guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) in handling all cases of suspected misconduct.

 

16. Advertising Policy

- The IJTPE Journal does not accept or display commercial advertising on its website or within its published content. The journal is dedicated to maintaining a focused academic environment free from promotional or commercial influence.

- All editorial decisions are made independently and are based solely on the quality and integrity of the submitted work. The journal ensures a clear separation between editorial content and any external or financial considerations, safeguarding the objectivity and credibility of its publications.

 

17. Direct Marketing Policy

- The IJTPE Journal communicates with researchers and the academic community in a respectful and responsible manner. Any invitations to submit manuscripts or announcements related to the IJTPE Journal are carefully directed to relevant audiences and are designed to be informative rather than intrusive.

- The IJTPE Journal is committed to presenting all information such as its scope, editorial process, and indexing status clearly and accurately. The IJTPE Journal does not engage in misleading, exaggerated, or aggressive promotional practices, and strives to maintain transparency and trust in all its communications.